397 liens privés
Je vous avais déja parlé de ce site dans sa version anglaise: https://jeekajoo.eu/links/?hGSbEQ
Le voici en français, grâce au travail de Martin Lafréchoux (http://nologos.net/projects/idees-recues-sur-le-velo/) et Thomas Miles.
Don’t be fooled by common myths about cycling – use our explanations to help spread the truth!
Très bon site qui détruit les idées fausses, les préjugés, les sophismes intentionnels sur les cyclistes / les aménagements cyclables / l'urbanisme en général.
"""
Quand on construit de nouvelles routes, on incite plus de gens à prendre leur voiture et les bouchons augmentent. Au Texas, la Katy Freeway, dotée de 26 voies, confirme ce paradoxe.
"""
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradoxe_de_Braess
"""
The most enduring popular traffic myth holds that building more roads always leads to less congestion. This belief is a perfectly logical one: if there are 100 cars packed into one highway lane, then building a second should mean there’s 50 cars in each. The problem, as transportation researchers have found again and again, is that when this new lane gets added the number of cars doesn’t stay the same. On the contrary, people who stopped driving out of frustration with traffic now attack the road with an enthusiasm unknown to mankind.
While residents of heavily congested metro areas have a suite of four-letter words to describe this effect, experts call it “induced demand.” What this means, simply put, is that building more road eventually (if not always immediately) leads to more traffic, not less. Fortunately, local leaders are starting to distinguish reality from myth when it comes to induced demand. Unfortunately, the best way to address it—congestion pricing—remains all-but politically impossible in the U.S. That pretty much leaves one thing to do: deal with it.
"""
Exemple en vidéo avec le cas de Utrecht: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsQQ8Ujbua4
La ville a comblé un canal pour en faire une autoroute urbaine qu'elle a détruit pour en faire un canal.